Pros of support.996.ICU

• More focused on international support and awareness
• Includes signatures from tech workers outside China
• Provides resources in multiple languages

Cons of support.996.ICU

• Smaller community and less engagement
• Limited to Microsoft employees and contractors
• Less comprehensive documentation on labor issues

Code Comparison

996.ICU:

weekday_work_time = 12 * 5  # 12 hours per day, 5 days a week
weekend_work_time = 12 * 1  # 12 hours on Saturday
total_weekly_hours = weekday_work_time + weekend_work_time
print(f"Total weekly work hours: {total_weekly_hours}")

support.996.ICU:

const workHours = {
  weekday: 8 * 5,  // 8 hours per day, 5 days a week
  weekend: 0       // No work on weekends
};
const totalWeeklyHours = workHours.weekday + workHours.weekend;
console.log(`Total weekly work hours: ${totalWeeklyHours}`);

The code snippets illustrate the difference in work hours between the 996 schedule (72 hours/week) and a standard 40-hour workweek. While 996.ICU focuses on highlighting the issue, support.996.ICU emphasizes a more balanced work schedule.

Both repositories aim to raise awareness about labor rights and working conditions in the tech industry, particularly in China. 996.ICU has a broader scope and larger community, while support.996.ICU provides a platform for international tech workers to show solidarity with their Chinese counterparts.

Pros of 996action

• More action-oriented, providing specific steps for workers to take
• Includes legal resources and templates for filing labor complaints
• Offers practical guidance on documenting overtime and workplace issues

Cons of 996action

• Smaller community and less visibility compared to 996.ICU
• Potentially higher risk for contributors due to its activist nature
• More focused on Chinese labor laws, limiting international applicability

Code Comparison

996.ICU:

**996.ICU**

* [中文版](./README_CN.md)

The name `996.ICU` refers to **"Work by '996', sick in ICU"**, an ironic saying among Chinese developers.

996action:

# 996action

[![Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/link-996.icu-%23FF4D5B.svg?style=flat-square)](https://996.icu/#/en_US)
[![LICENSE](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-Anti%20996-blue.svg?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/996icu/996.ICU/blob/master/LICENSE)

996action计划是一个旨在向中国劳动监察部门投诉违法加班制度的项目。

While both repositories address the 996 work culture issue, 996action focuses more on practical steps and legal actions, whereas 996.ICU serves as a broader platform for awareness and discussion. The code snippets show that 996action directly references 996.ICU, indicating its inspiration from the larger movement.

Pros of Awsome-Front-End-learning-resource

• Focused on front-end development resources, providing a curated list for learners
• Regularly updated with new learning materials and tools
• Organized into categories, making it easy to find specific topics

Cons of Awsome-Front-End-learning-resource

• Limited to front-end development, not addressing broader tech industry issues
• Smaller community engagement and fewer contributors
• Less international visibility and impact

Code comparison

While a direct code comparison isn't relevant for these repositories, we can compare their README.md structures:

996.ICU:

# 996.ICU

* [中文版](./README_CN.md)

The name `996.ICU` refers to **"Work by '996', sick in ICU"**, an ironic saying among Chinese developers.

Awsome-Front-End-learning-resource:

# 前端学习资料库

这个库主要用于存放我在学习前端过程中遇到的一些不错的资料。

## 目录

The 996.ICU repository focuses on raising awareness about work conditions, while Awsome-Front-End-learning-resource is a collection of learning resources for front-end development. The former has a broader social impact, while the latter is more specialized and educational in nature.

Pros of 955.WLB

• Focuses on promoting a healthier work-life balance (9am-5pm, 5 days a week)
• Provides a list of companies that adhere to better working conditions
• Encourages a more positive approach to workplace reform

Cons of 955.WLB

• Less widespread recognition and impact compared to 996.ICU
• Smaller community and fewer contributors
• Limited to listing companies rather than addressing broader labor issues

Code Comparison

955.WLB:

## 955 公司名单

* Google
* Microsoft
* Intel
* IBM
* Apple

996.ICU:

"996"工作制，即每天早 9 点到岗，一直工作到晚上 9 点，每周工作 6 天。

"996"工作制的周工作时间为最低 60 小时。

The 955.WLB repository primarily consists of a list of companies that follow a 9am-5pm, 5 days a week work schedule. In contrast, the 996.ICU repository contains more detailed information about labor laws, worker rights, and the negative impacts of the 996 work culture.

While 955.WLB promotes a positive work environment, 996.ICU has gained more traction as a movement against excessive work hours in the tech industry. 996.ICU also includes more comprehensive documentation and resources for workers, making it a more robust platform for addressing labor issues in the tech sector.