Pros of cool-retro-term

• Offers a unique, nostalgic CRT terminal experience with customizable visual effects
• Provides a wide range of color schemes and fonts to choose from
• Includes built-in profiles for different retro terminal styles

Cons of cool-retro-term

• May consume more system resources due to its graphical effects
• Limited to terminal emulation functionality
• Requires Qt and OpenGL, which may not be available on all systems

Code comparison

cool-retro-term (QML):

Rectangle {
    id: frame
    anchors.fill: parent
    color: shadersettings.background_color
    opacity: shadersettings.window_opacity
}

hermit (Shell):

if [ -z "${HERMIT_STATE}" ]; then
    export HERMIT_STATE="${XDG_DATA_HOME:-$HOME/.local/share}/hermit"
fi

Summary

cool-retro-term is a visually appealing terminal emulator that focuses on recreating the look and feel of old CRT monitors. It offers extensive customization options for aesthetics but may be more resource-intensive.

hermit, on the other hand, is a lightweight shell configuration framework that aims to simplify shell setup and management. It provides a modular approach to organizing shell configurations and plugins.

While both projects relate to terminal environments, they serve different purposes. cool-retro-term is ideal for users seeking a nostalgic and visually rich terminal experience, while hermit is better suited for those looking to streamline their shell configuration management.

Pros of wezterm

• More feature-rich terminal emulator with GPU acceleration and multiplexer support
• Cross-platform compatibility (Windows, macOS, Linux)
• Active development with frequent updates and improvements

Cons of wezterm

• Larger codebase and potentially higher resource usage
• Steeper learning curve due to more advanced features
• May be overkill for users seeking a simple terminal emulator

Code comparison

wezterm (Rust):

let mut config = Config::new();
config.set_font(FontConfig::new("JetBrains Mono"));
config.set_color_scheme("Solarized Dark");
config.set_window_decorations(WindowDecorations::INTEGRATED_BUTTONS | WindowDecorations::RESIZE);

hermit (Go):

config := &Config{
    Font:     "JetBrains Mono",
    Theme:    "solarized-dark",
    Padding:  [4]int{10, 10, 0, 10},
}

Summary

wezterm is a more comprehensive terminal emulator with advanced features and cross-platform support, while hermit focuses on simplicity and lightweight design. wezterm may be preferred by power users and developers working across multiple platforms, whereas hermit might appeal to those seeking a minimalist terminal experience on Linux systems.

Pros of Alacritty

• Written in Rust, offering better performance and memory safety
• Cross-platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux)
• GPU-accelerated rendering for smoother display

Cons of Alacritty

• Larger codebase and more complex architecture
• Steeper learning curve for contributors
• Less focus on customization and theming

Code Comparison

Hermit (JavaScript):

const term = new Terminal({
  fontFamily: 'Hermit',
  fontSize: 14,
  theme: hermitTheme
});

Alacritty (Rust):

let config = Config {
    font: Font::new("Alacritty", 14.0),
    colors: Colors::default(),
    // ... other configuration options
};

Key Differences

• Hermit is a lightweight terminal emulator focused on simplicity and customization
• Alacritty prioritizes performance and cross-platform compatibility
• Hermit is written in JavaScript, making it more accessible for web developers
• Alacritty's Rust implementation provides better system-level integration and speed

Use Cases

• Hermit: Ideal for users who prefer a simple, customizable terminal with web technologies
• Alacritty: Better suited for power users and those requiring high-performance terminals across multiple platforms

Pros of kitty

• More feature-rich and customizable terminal emulator
• Cross-platform support (Linux, macOS)
• Extensive documentation and active community

Cons of kitty

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex configuration
• Larger resource footprint compared to minimal terminals

Code comparison

kitty configuration example:

font_family      Fira Code
font_size        12.0
cursor_shape     beam
background_opacity 0.9

hermit configuration example:

[colors]
background = "#1a1b26"
foreground = "#c0caf5"

[font]
size = 11

Key differences

• Hermit is a Rust-based terminal emulator, while kitty is written in C and Python
• Kitty offers more advanced features like GPU acceleration and image rendering
• Hermit focuses on simplicity and minimal resource usage

Use cases

• Choose kitty for a feature-rich, highly customizable terminal experience
• Opt for Hermit if you prefer a lightweight, minimalist terminal with good performance

Both projects are actively maintained and offer modern terminal emulation capabilities, but cater to different user preferences and requirements.

Pros of Hyper

• More active development with frequent updates and releases
• Larger community and ecosystem with numerous plugins and themes
• Cross-platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux)

Cons of Hyper

• Higher resource usage due to Electron-based architecture
• Slower startup time compared to native terminal emulators
• Some users report occasional stability issues

Code Comparison

Hermit configuration (config.toml):

[colors]
background = "#282c34"
foreground = "#abb2bf"

[font]
size = 14

Hyper configuration (.hyper.js):

module.exports = {
  config: {
    backgroundColor: '#282c34',
    foregroundColor: '#abb2bf',
    fontSize: 14,
  }
};

Summary

Hyper is a more feature-rich and customizable terminal emulator with a larger community, while Hermit focuses on simplicity and performance. Hyper offers cross-platform support and a wide range of plugins, but may consume more system resources. Hermit provides a lightweight alternative with a simpler configuration process. The choice between the two depends on individual needs for features, customization, and system resources.

Pros of Tilix

• More mature and actively maintained project with frequent updates
• Feature-rich terminal emulator with advanced tiling and customization options
• Cross-platform compatibility (Linux, macOS, Windows)

Cons of Tilix

• Larger codebase and potentially more complex to contribute to
• Heavier resource usage due to more features and GUI elements
• Steeper learning curve for new users

Code Comparison

Tilix (D language):

class Terminal : Widget, ITerminal
{
    this() {
        super(new VTE.Terminal());
        addOnRealize(&onRealize);
        addOnUnmap(&onUnmap);
    }
    // ...
}

Hermit (Rust):

pub struct Terminal {
    pub term: vte::Terminal,
    pub config: Config,
    pub scrollback: usize,
    pub title: String,
}

Summary

Tilix is a more comprehensive terminal emulator with advanced features, while Hermit appears to be a simpler, lightweight alternative. Tilix offers more customization options and cross-platform support, but may be more resource-intensive. Hermit, being written in Rust, potentially offers better performance and memory safety, but with fewer features. The choice between them depends on user preferences for features vs. simplicity.