Pros of Hugo

• Full-featured static site generator with extensive documentation
• Faster build times and better performance for large sites
• Wider ecosystem with more themes and plugins available

Cons of Hugo

• Steeper learning curve, especially for non-technical users
• More complex configuration and setup process
• Requires Go knowledge for advanced customization

Code Comparison

Hugo (config.toml):

baseURL = "https://example.com"
languageCode = "en-us"
title = "My Hugo Site"
theme = "ananke"

[params]
  description = "Welcome to my website"

PaperMod (config.yml):

baseURL: "https://example.com"
title: My PaperMod Site
theme: PaperMod

params:
  description: "Welcome to my website"

Summary

Hugo is a powerful static site generator with extensive features and performance benefits, suitable for large-scale projects. PaperMod is a lightweight theme for Hugo, offering a simpler setup and easier customization for beginners. While Hugo provides more flexibility and scalability, PaperMod focuses on providing a clean, minimalist design out of the box. The choice between them depends on the project's complexity and the user's technical expertise.

Pros of Hugo Coder

• Minimalist design with a focus on readability and simplicity
• Built-in support for multiple languages and internationalization
• Extensive customization options through configuration files

Cons of Hugo Coder

• Less feature-rich compared to PaperMod
• Fewer built-in shortcodes and widgets
• Limited social media integration options

Code Comparison

Hugo Coder configuration example:

[params]
    author = "John Doe"
    info = "Full Stack DevOps and Magician"
    description = "John Doe's personal website"
    keywords = "blog,developer,personal"
    avatarurl = "images/avatar.jpg"

PaperMod configuration example:

params:
  env: production
  title: ExampleSite
  description: "ExampleSite description"
  keywords: [Blog, Portfolio, PaperMod]
  author: Me
  images: ["<link or path of image for opengraph, twitter-cards>"]

Both themes offer easy configuration through their respective configuration files. Hugo Coder uses TOML format, while PaperMod uses YAML. PaperMod's configuration includes more advanced options like environment settings and SEO-related parameters out of the box.

Pros of hugo-theme-terminal

• Minimalist, retro-style design that stands out
• Built-in dark mode support
• Customizable color schemes

Cons of hugo-theme-terminal

• Limited layout options compared to PaperMod
• Fewer built-in features and widgets
• May not be suitable for content-heavy websites

Code Comparison

hugo-theme-terminal:

<header class="header">
  <div class="header__inner">
    <div class="header__logo">
      {{ partial "logo.html" . }}
    </div>
    {{ partial "menu.html" . }}
  </div>
</header>

PaperMod:

<header class="header">
    {{- if not (.Param "hideHeaderMenu") }}
    <nav class="nav">
        {{- if (or .IsHome .Site.Params.disableHeaderTitle) }}
        {{- partialCached "header_nav.html" . }}
        {{- else }}
        {{- partial "header_nav.html" . }}
        {{- end }}
    </nav>
    {{- end }}
</header>

Both themes use a similar structure for the header, but PaperMod offers more conditional rendering options and a dedicated navigation partial. hugo-theme-terminal's approach is simpler and more straightforward, aligning with its minimalist design philosophy.

Pros of Ananke

• More customizable with built-in color themes and layout options
• Better documentation and examples for beginners
• Includes multilingual support out of the box

Cons of Ananke

• Less minimalist design, which may not suit all preferences
• Slower loading times due to more complex structure
• Fewer built-in shortcodes compared to PaperMod

Code Comparison

PaperMod's main menu implementation:

{{ range .Site.Menus.main }}
<li><a href="{{ .URL | relLangURL }}">{{ .Name }}</a></li>
{{ end }}

Ananke's main menu implementation:

{{ range .Site.Menus.main }}
  <a class="f3 fw2 hover-white no-underline white-90 dib" href="{{ .URL }}" title="{{ .Name }}">
    {{ .Name }}
  </a>
{{ end }}

Ananke uses more classes for styling, while PaperMod keeps it simpler. This reflects the overall design philosophy of each theme, with Ananke offering more built-in customization options and PaperMod focusing on minimalism and performance.

Pros of hello-friend-ng

• More customization options for social icons and menu items
• Built-in support for multilingual sites
• Includes a portfolio section for showcasing projects

Cons of hello-friend-ng

• Less frequent updates and maintenance compared to PaperMod
• Slightly more complex configuration due to additional features
• May have a steeper learning curve for beginners

Code Comparison

hello-friend-ng:

[params]
  dateform        = "Jan 2, 2006"
  dateformShort   = "Jan 2"
  dateformNum     = "2006-01-02"
  dateformNumTime = "2006-01-02 15:04"

PaperMod:

params:
  DateFormat: "January 2, 2006"
  ShowReadingTime: true
  ShowShareButtons: true
  ShowPostNavLinks: true

Both themes offer customizable date formats, but hello-friend-ng provides more granular control with separate options for different date display scenarios. PaperMod's configuration is more streamlined, focusing on enabling or disabling specific features.

While hello-friend-ng offers more built-in customization options, PaperMod's simpler configuration may be preferable for users seeking a more straightforward setup process. The choice between the two themes ultimately depends on the specific needs of the project and the user's preference for customization versus simplicity.