Top Related Projects
Go support for Google's protocol buffers
C++ based gRPC (C++, Python, Ruby, Objective-C, PHP, C#)
Your Swiss Army Knife for Protocol Buffers
Documentation generator plugin for Google Protocol Buffers
Quick Overview
Buf is a modern Protocol Buffers ecosystem, providing tools for API design, linting, breaking change detection, and code generation. It aims to simplify and streamline the development process for Protocol Buffer-based APIs, offering a more user-friendly and efficient alternative to traditional protoc-based workflows.
Pros
- Simplified workflow for Protocol Buffer development and management
- Powerful linting and breaking change detection capabilities
- Supports remote generation and caching of generated code
- Integrates well with existing Protocol Buffer ecosystems
Cons
- Learning curve for developers familiar with traditional protoc workflows
- May require changes to existing build processes and CI/CD pipelines
- Limited support for some less common Protocol Buffer features
- Relatively new project, still evolving and stabilizing
Code Examples
- Initializing a Buf project:
buf mod init
This command initializes a new Buf module in the current directory.
- Linting Protocol Buffer files:
buf lint
This command runs the Buf linter on your Protocol Buffer files, checking for style and best practice violations.
- Detecting breaking changes:
buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main'
This command checks for breaking changes between the current branch and the main branch.
Getting Started
To get started with Buf, follow these steps:
-
Install Buf:
brew install bufbuild/buf/buf -
Initialize a Buf project:
buf mod init -
Create a
buf.yamlconfiguration file:version: v1 lint: use: - DEFAULT breaking: use: - FILE -
Run Buf commands:
buf lint buf generate buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main'
These steps will set up a basic Buf project and demonstrate some of its core functionalities.
Competitor Comparisons
Go support for Google's protocol buffers
Pros of protobuf
- Mature and widely adopted in the Go ecosystem
- Directly supported and maintained by the Go team
- Extensive documentation and community resources
Cons of protobuf
- Limited built-in linting and formatting capabilities
- Lacks advanced features for managing multiple proto files and dependencies
- Requires additional tools for a complete protobuf workflow
Code Comparison
protobuf:
import "google.golang.org/protobuf/proto"
message := &MyProtoMessage{Field: "value"}
data, err := proto.Marshal(message)
buf:
import "github.com/bufbuild/buf/cmd/buf/command"
cmd := command.NewRoot()
err := cmd.Execute()
Key Differences
- buf focuses on providing a comprehensive toolkit for Protocol Buffers, including linting, formatting, and dependency management
- protobuf is primarily a library for working with Protocol Buffers in Go
- buf offers a more streamlined workflow for managing proto files across projects
- protobuf provides lower-level access to Protocol Buffer internals
Use Cases
- Choose protobuf for direct integration with Go projects and when lower-level control is needed
- Opt for buf when working on larger projects with multiple proto files, or when seeking a more robust development workflow
Community and Ecosystem
- protobuf has a larger user base and more third-party integrations
- buf is gaining popularity for its modern approach to Protocol Buffer development
C++ based gRPC (C++, Python, Ruby, Objective-C, PHP, C#)
Pros of gRPC
- Mature and widely adopted framework with extensive language support
- Comprehensive ecosystem with tools for load balancing, authentication, and monitoring
- High-performance, low-latency communication using HTTP/2
Cons of gRPC
- Steeper learning curve and more complex setup compared to Buf
- Requires more boilerplate code for basic implementations
- Limited browser support without additional proxies or libraries
Code Comparison
gRPC (Python):
import grpc
from example_pb2 import ExampleRequest
from example_pb2_grpc import ExampleServiceStub
channel = grpc.insecure_channel('localhost:50051')
stub = ExampleServiceStub(channel)
response = stub.ExampleMethod(ExampleRequest(name='John'))
Buf (Go):
import (
"context"
"github.com/bufbuild/connect-go"
"github.com/bufbuild/connect-grpcreflect-go"
)
client := connect.NewClient[ExampleServiceClient](http.DefaultClient, "http://localhost:8080")
resp, err := client.ExampleMethod(context.Background(), connect.NewRequest(&ExampleRequest{Name: "John"}))
Summary
gRPC offers a robust, high-performance framework with extensive language support and a comprehensive ecosystem. However, it comes with a steeper learning curve and more complex setup. Buf provides a simpler, more streamlined approach to building and managing Protocol Buffers-based APIs, making it easier to get started but potentially sacrificing some of the advanced features and ecosystem support that gRPC offers.
Your Swiss Army Knife for Protocol Buffers
Pros of Prototool
- More mature project with longer history and established user base
- Offers linting and formatting capabilities out of the box
- Provides a single binary for multiple protobuf-related tasks
Cons of Prototool
- Less active development and maintenance compared to Buf
- Limited support for modern protobuf features and ecosystem integrations
- Slower performance for large protobuf projects
Code Comparison
Prototool configuration:
lint:
rules:
add:
- ENUM_NAMES_UPPER_SNAKE_CASE
remove:
- ENUM_NAMES_CAMEL_CASE
Buf configuration:
version: v1
lint:
use:
- DEFAULT
enum_zero_value_suffix: _UNSPECIFIED
breaking:
use:
- FILE
Prototool focuses on a more traditional approach to protobuf management, while Buf offers a more modern and comprehensive solution. Buf provides better performance, more extensive ecosystem support, and a stronger focus on breaking change detection. However, Prototool may be preferred by users who need a simpler, all-in-one tool for basic protobuf tasks and are comfortable with its established workflow.
Documentation generator plugin for Google Protocol Buffers
Pros of protoc-gen-doc
- Focused specifically on generating documentation for Protocol Buffers
- Supports multiple output formats (HTML, Markdown, JSON)
- Lightweight and easy to integrate into existing protoc workflows
Cons of protoc-gen-doc
- Limited to documentation generation, lacking broader protobuf tooling features
- Requires manual integration with protoc, potentially more setup work
- Less active development and community support compared to Buf
Code Comparison
protoc-gen-doc usage:
protoc --doc_out=./docs --doc_opt=html,index.html protos/*.proto
Buf usage:
buf generate
Key Differences
Buf is a comprehensive Protocol Buffers ecosystem tool, offering features like linting, breaking change detection, and a remote schema registry. protoc-gen-doc, on the other hand, is a specialized tool for generating documentation from protobuf files.
Buf aims to simplify the entire protobuf workflow, including code generation and management, while protoc-gen-doc focuses solely on documentation generation.
Buf has a more active development community and frequent updates, whereas protoc-gen-doc has a more stable but less frequently updated codebase.
Convert
designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
Buf
Buf is the modern toolchain for Protobuf. It replaces day-to-day protoc use with a fast compiler, module-aware workspaces, formatting, linting, breaking-change detection, code generation, dependency management, API calls, and a client for the Buf Schema Registry.
If you are still driving Protobuf with shell scripts around protoc -I ..., Buf is the upgrade you want: the same schema language, the same generated-code plugin model, fewer moving parts, and a direct path from local .proto files to governed, versioned APIs.
Start
Install buf with Homebrew:
brew install bufbuild/buf/buf
Initialize a workspace and run the checks you should expect every Protobuf repository to pass:
buf config init
buf build
buf format -w
buf lint
buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main'
Generate code from a checked-in buf.gen.yaml instead of a hand-maintained shell command:
buf generate
For a guided walkthrough from an empty workspace to a working Connect service, run the Buf CLI quickstart.
Why Buf wins
| Protobuf work | With protoc and scripts | With Buf |
|---|---|---|
| Finding files | Maintain -I paths and hope import order does not change behavior. | Declare modules once in buf.yaml; Buf discovers files and rejects ambiguous imports. |
| Compiling | Manage a local protoc install and parse changing stderr output. | Use Buf's internal compiler, tested against protoc descriptor output and built for deterministic parallel compilation. |
| Style | Rely on review comments or separate tooling. | Run buf lint locally, in editors, in CI, and on the BSR with 40+ built-in rules plus custom plugins. |
| Compatibility | Find breakage after generated code fails, clients fail, or serialized data becomes unreadable. | Run buf breaking against Git, a BSR module, a tarball, a zip file, or a Buf image before merge. |
| Code generation | Keep plugin binaries installed on every machine and encode behavior in long commands. | Put plugins, outputs, options, inputs, and managed-mode settings in buf.gen.yaml; use local or remote plugins. |
| Dependencies | Copy .proto files between repositories or vendor them by hand. | Declare BSR module dependencies in buf.yaml and pin them in buf.lock. |
| API consumers | Send people your schemas and generation instructions. | Publish to the BSR and let consumers install generated SDKs with go get, npm install, Maven, Gradle, pip install, NuGet, Cargo, SwiftPM, CMake, or an archive. |
| Governance | Reimplement checks in every repository and hope every team keeps them enabled. | Enforce breaking-change, uniqueness, and custom policies at the BSR layer. |
Core CLI features work without a BSR account. Signing in to the registry adds distribution, remote plugins, generated SDKs, hosted docs, dependency resolution for private modules, and server-side checks when you need them.
Core workflow
Buf treats a directory tree of .proto files as a module, and a project as a workspace. A small buf.yaml is enough to make build, lint, breaking-change detection, generation, dependency resolution, and publishing agree on the same input.
version: v2
modules:
- path: proto
lint:
use:
- STANDARD
breaking:
use:
- FILE
From there, the useful commands are deliberately boring:
buf build
buf format -w
buf lint
buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main'
buf generate
buf push
buf build compiles the workspace. buf lint catches API-shape problems while the author is still editing. buf breaking compares the current schema against a previous version and flags source, JSON, or wire-format incompatibilities. buf generate runs protoc plugins from a checked-in template. buf push publishes named modules to the BSR.
Code generation
buf generate is compatible with the normal protoc plugin model, but it moves generation into versioned configuration. This example generates Go Protobuf types and ConnectRPC handlers from proto/ using remote plugins hosted on the BSR:
version: v2
clean: true
managed:
enabled: true
override:
- file_option: go_package_prefix
value: github.com/acme/weather/gen/go
plugins:
- remote: buf.build/protocolbuffers/go
out: gen/go
opt: paths=source_relative
- remote: buf.build/connectrpc/gosimple
out: gen/go
opt:
- paths=source_relative
- simple
inputs:
- directory: proto
Remote plugins remove the need to install and maintain generator binaries on every developer machine or CI runner. Managed mode lets API producers keep language-specific file options out of .proto files while consumers still get correct generated package names for their target language.
Local plugins work too. If a plugin speaks the standard Protobuf plugin protocol, Buf can run it.
Breaking changes
Protobuf compatibility is not one thing. Renaming a field can break generated source code while preserving the binary wire format; changing a field from int32 to string breaks every existing serialized message. buf breaking makes that distinction explicit with rule categories for FILE, PACKAGE, WIRE_JSON, and WIRE compatibility.
buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main'
--against accepts a Git branch, a BSR module, a tarball, a zip file, a local directory, or a prebuilt Buf image. That matters in real repositories: the same command works on a laptop, in CI, and in release automation.
Buf Schema Registry
Buf Schema Registry is a Protobuf-aware registry. It stores modules, verifies they compile, renders documentation, resolves dependencies, hosts remote plugins, produces generated SDKs, and can enforce schema checks before a breaking change reaches consumers.
buf push
Pushing a module to the BSR gives your organization a source of truth for Protobuf APIs. Consumers can depend on the schema as a BSR module, install generated SDKs from their normal package manager, or use the BSR docs to inspect services, messages, fields, enums, references, and historical commits.
Related projects
Buf is most useful when schemas drive more than code generation. ConnectRPC uses Protobuf schemas to build simple HTTP APIs that support Connect, gRPC, and gRPC-Web without separate service definitions. Protobuf-ES gives JavaScript and TypeScript users a modern Protobuf runtime and generator. Protovalidate puts validation rules in the schema and runs them consistently across languages.
One contract should drive the whole workflow: compile, lint, compatibility checks, generated clients and servers, validation, API calls, package publishing, and governed changes.
Installation
Homebrew installs the buf, protoc-gen-buf-breaking, and protoc-gen-buf-lint binaries, plus shell completion scripts for Bash, Fish, PowerShell, and zsh.
brew install bufbuild/buf/buf
Other supported installation methods include npm, Windows, Docker, binary downloads, tarballs, source builds, and minisign verification. See the installation docs for the full list.
CLI stability
Buf CLI releases do not make breaking changes within a major version. Since buf reached v1.0, you can expect no breaking changes until v2.0. We have no plans to release v2.0.
This policy does not apply to commands behind the buf beta gate. Expect breaking changes for beta commands until they are promoted.
Documentation
- Buf CLI
- CLI quickstart
- Modules and workspaces
- Code generation
- Linting
- Breaking-change detection
- Formatting
- Calling APIs with
buf curl - Buf Schema Registry
- Generated SDKs
- Remote plugins
- Schema checks
- Migrating from
protoc
Community
For help and discussion around Protobuf, best practices, and Buf, join us on Slack.
For bugs, feature requests, and technical questions, open an issue in this repository or email dev@buf.build. For general inquiries, email info@buf.build.
Top Related Projects
Go support for Google's protocol buffers
C++ based gRPC (C++, Python, Ruby, Objective-C, PHP, C#)
Your Swiss Army Knife for Protocol Buffers
Documentation generator plugin for Google Protocol Buffers
Convert
designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot