Pros of StackEdit

• Offers offline editing capabilities
• Supports multiple storage providers (Google Drive, Dropbox, GitHub)
• Provides real-time collaboration features

Cons of StackEdit

• Less frequent updates compared to Dillinger
• More complex setup for self-hosting

Code Comparison

StackEdit (Vue.js component):

<template>
  <div class="editor">
    <textarea v-model="content"></textarea>
    <div v-html="renderedContent"></div>
  </div>
</template>

Dillinger (Angular.js controller):

angular.module('diligent.editor', [])
  .controller('Editor', function($scope) {
    $scope.content = '';
    $scope.renderedContent = '';
  });

Both StackEdit and Dillinger are popular Markdown editors with web-based interfaces. StackEdit offers more flexibility in terms of storage options and offline editing, making it suitable for users who need to work without an internet connection. It also provides real-time collaboration features, which can be beneficial for team projects.

On the other hand, Dillinger has a simpler setup process for self-hosting and receives more frequent updates. This can be advantageous for users who prioritize the latest features and improvements.

The code comparison shows that StackEdit uses Vue.js for its frontend, while Dillinger is built with Angular.js. This difference in frameworks may impact the development experience and performance of each application.

Pros of MarkText

• Cross-platform desktop application (Windows, macOS, Linux)
• Offers a WYSIWYG editing experience
• Supports various export formats (PDF, HTML, etc.)

Cons of MarkText

• Requires installation, not web-based like Dillinger
• May have a steeper learning curve for new users

Code Comparison

MarkText (Electron-based app):

const { app, BrowserWindow } = require('electron')

function createWindow () {
  const win = new BrowserWindow({ width: 800, height: 600 })
  win.loadFile('index.html')
}

app.whenReady().then(createWindow)

Dillinger (Web-based app):

const express = require('express')
const app = express()

app.get('/', (req, res) => {
  res.sendFile(__dirname + '/index.html')
})

app.listen(3000, () => console.log('Server running on port 3000'))

Both projects are Markdown editors, but they differ in their implementation and target platforms. MarkText is a desktop application built with Electron, offering a more native experience across different operating systems. Dillinger, on the other hand, is a web-based editor that can be accessed from any browser without installation.

MarkText provides a richer set of features and export options, making it suitable for users who require more advanced functionality. Dillinger's web-based nature makes it more accessible for quick edits and collaborations, especially when working on different devices.

Pros of Notable

• Offers a more comprehensive note-taking experience with features like tags, attachments, and multi-notebook support
• Provides a native desktop application for offline use and better performance
• Supports advanced Markdown features and real-time rendering

Cons of Notable

• Lacks real-time collaboration features present in Dillinger
• May have a steeper learning curve due to its more extensive feature set
• Requires installation, unlike Dillinger's web-based approach

Code Comparison

Notable (React component):

const Editor = ({ content, onChange }) => (
  <ReactMde
    value={content}
    onChange={onChange}
    selectedTab="write"
    generateMarkdownPreview={markdown => Promise.resolve(converter.makeHtml(markdown))}
  />
);

Dillinger (Angular component):

<div ng-model="documentContent" ui-codemirror="{
  lineWrapping : true,
  lineNumbers: false,
  mode: 'markdown',
  matchBrackets: true
}"></div>

While both projects use different frameworks, they both implement Markdown editors with preview functionality. Notable uses a React-based editor with more modern syntax, while Dillinger relies on AngularJS with a UI-CodeMirror directive for its editor implementation.