Pros of v2ray-core

• Core functionality: Provides the fundamental V2Ray protocol implementation
• Flexibility: Can be integrated into various projects and systems
• Active development: Regularly updated with new features and improvements

Cons of v2ray-core

• Complexity: Requires more technical knowledge to set up and configure
• Limited user-friendliness: Lacks built-in scripts for easy deployment

Code comparison

v2ray-core:

type Server struct {
    config *Config
    ohm    outbound.Manager
    router routing.Router
    ihm    inbound.Manager
}

v2ray-agent:

installV2Ray(){
    echoContent skyBlue "\nProgress  $1/${totalProgress} : Install V2Ray"
    # ... (installation steps)
}

v2ray-core focuses on the core implementation, while v2ray-agent provides installation scripts and management tools. The v2ray-core snippet shows the main Server struct, whereas v2ray-agent includes a Bash function for V2Ray installation.

v2ray-agent simplifies the deployment process, making it more accessible to users with less technical expertise. However, v2ray-core offers greater flexibility for developers who want to integrate V2Ray functionality into their own projects or create custom implementations.

Pros of v2rayN

• User-friendly GUI for Windows, making it easier for non-technical users
• Supports multiple protocols and configurations in one client
• Regular updates and active community support

Cons of v2rayN

• Limited to Windows platform, reducing cross-platform compatibility
• May have a steeper learning curve for advanced configurations
• Lacks some of the automated deployment features found in v2ray-agent

Code Comparison

v2rayN (C#):

public static int RunAsAdmin(string arguments)
{
    Process process = new Process();
    process.StartInfo.FileName = Utils.GetExePath();
    process.StartInfo.Arguments = arguments;
    process.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = true;
    process.StartInfo.Verb = "runas";
    process.Start();
    return process.Id;
}

v2ray-agent (Shell Script):

installV2Ray(){
    echoContent skyBlue "\nProgress  $1/${totalProgress} : Install V2Ray"
    # Version
    if [[ "${selectCoreType}" == "2" ]]; then
        version=$(curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/v2fly/v2ray-core/releases | jq -r '[.[] | select(.prerelease == false)][0] | .tag_name')
    else
        version=${v2rayCoreVersion}
    fi

Pros of v2ray-rules-dat

• Focuses on providing comprehensive rule sets for V2Ray, including domain lists and IP lists
• Regularly updated with the latest domain and IP information
• Offers flexibility in choosing different rule sets based on specific needs

Cons of v2ray-rules-dat

• Requires manual integration with V2Ray configuration
• May need additional setup and maintenance compared to all-in-one solutions

Code Comparison

v2ray-rules-dat:

{
  "routing": {
    "rules": [
      {
        "type": "field",
        "outboundTag": "proxy",
        "domain": ["geosite:category-ads-all"]
      }
    ]
  }
}

v2ray-agent:

#!/bin/bash
# This script installs and configures v2ray-agent
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mack-a/v2ray-agent/master/install.sh -o install.sh && bash install.sh

v2ray-rules-dat provides rule sets that can be directly integrated into V2Ray configurations, offering granular control over routing. v2ray-agent, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive installation and management script for V2Ray setups, simplifying the deployment process but potentially with less customization in routing rules.

Pros of Xray-core

• More lightweight and efficient core implementation
• Supports XTLS protocol for improved performance
• Active development with frequent updates

Cons of Xray-core

• Less user-friendly for beginners
• Requires more manual configuration
• Fewer built-in tools for server management

Code Comparison

v2ray-agent (install.sh):

echoContent skyBlue "\nProgress  $1/${totalProgress} : $2"

Xray-core (main.go):

common.Must(defaultJson.UnmarshalJSON([]byte(jsonConfig)))

v2ray-agent focuses on providing a user-friendly installation script, while Xray-core emphasizes core functionality and performance. The v2ray-agent code snippet shows a progress indicator for the installation process, whereas the Xray-core snippet demonstrates JSON configuration parsing.

Xray-core is a more specialized tool for advanced users seeking optimal performance, while v2ray-agent offers a more accessible solution for quick deployment and management of V2Ray servers. The choice between them depends on the user's technical expertise and specific requirements.

Pros of v2rayA

• User-friendly web GUI for easier management and configuration
• Multi-platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux)
• Built-in subscription management and automatic updates

Cons of v2rayA

• Larger codebase and potentially higher resource usage
• May have a steeper learning curve for users new to v2ray

Code Comparison

v2rayA:

func (s *VmessOutboundJson) BuildV2rayConfig() (*conf.Config, error) {
    outbound := &conf.OutboundConfig{
        Protocol: "vmess",
        Settings: &conf.OutboundConfigSettings{},
    }
    // ... (additional configuration)
}

v2ray-agent:

installV2Ray(){
    echoContent skyBlue "\nProgress  $1/${totalProgress} : Install V2Ray"
    # ... (installation steps)
}

The v2rayA project uses Go for its core functionality, providing a more structured approach to building v2ray configurations. In contrast, v2ray-agent primarily uses shell scripts for installation and management, which may be simpler but less flexible for complex configurations.