Pros of awesome-remote-job

• More comprehensive resource covering various aspects of remote work
• Includes tools, articles, and learning resources beyond job listings
• Regularly updated with community contributions

Cons of awesome-remote-job

• Less structured format for job listings
• May require more effort to find specific job opportunities
• Lacks a standardized format for company information

Code comparison

remote-jobs:

| Company | Website | Region |
|---------|---------|--------|
| [Company Name](https://example.com) | https://example.com/careers | Worldwide |

awesome-remote-job:

- [Company Name](https://example.com) - Description of the company and its remote work policy.

The remote-jobs repository uses a table format for job listings, making it easier to scan and compare companies. The awesome-remote-job repository uses a more flexible list format, allowing for additional information but potentially less structured.

Both repositories serve as valuable resources for remote job seekers, with remote-jobs focusing specifically on company listings and awesome-remote-job offering a broader range of remote work-related information. The choice between the two depends on whether you're looking for a structured job listing format or a more comprehensive resource on remote work.

Pros of remote-jobs

• Larger community and more contributors
• More frequently updated with new job listings
• Better organized with clear categories and tags

Cons of remote-jobs

• May contain outdated information due to its size
• Potentially overwhelming for users due to the volume of listings
• Harder to verify all listings are legitimate

Code comparison

remote-jobs:

# Company Name

| Website | Region | Country | City |
|---------|--------|---------|------|
| https://example.com | Worldwide | 🌎 | N/A |

## How to Apply
...

remote-jobs>:

# Company Name

* Website: https://example.com
* Location: Worldwide

## Company blurb
...

The remote-jobs repository uses a more structured format with a table for company details, while remote-jobs> uses a simpler list format. Both include essential information, but remote-jobs provides a more standardized layout that may be easier to parse programmatically.

Overall, remote-jobs appears to be the more comprehensive and actively maintained repository, offering a wider range of remote job opportunities. However, remote-jobs> may be more suitable for users looking for a simpler, more concise list of remote job options.

Pros of established-remote

• More focused on established companies with a track record of remote work
• Includes additional details like company size and funding information
• Curated list with stricter inclusion criteria

Cons of established-remote

• Smaller list of companies compared to remote-jobs
• Less frequently updated
• Doesn't include as many startups or smaller companies

Code comparison

remote-jobs:

* [Company Name](https://example.com) | Optional location | Description of the company

established-remote:

- name: Company Name
  url: https://example.com
  careers: https://example.com/careers
  size: 100-500
  funding: Public

The remote-jobs repository uses a simple markdown list format, while established-remote uses YAML for more structured data. The established-remote format allows for easier parsing and inclusion of additional details about each company.

Both repositories serve as valuable resources for job seekers interested in remote work opportunities. remote-jobs offers a more extensive list of companies, including startups and smaller organizations, while established-remote focuses on well-established remote-friendly companies with more detailed information about each entry.

Pros of awesome-learning-resources

• Broader scope, covering various tech topics beyond just job listings
• Regularly updated with new learning resources
• Organized by technology/topic for easy navigation

Cons of awesome-learning-resources

• Less focused on specific job opportunities
• May require more curation by users to find relevant content
• Not directly actionable for job seekers

Code comparison

While these repositories don't contain significant code, they differ in structure:

awesome-learning-resources:

## JavaScript

- [FreeCodeCamp](https://freecodecamp.org)
- [JavaScript.info](https://javascript.info/)
- [JavaScript30](https://javascript30.com/)

remote-jobs:

## Companies

Name | Website | Region
------------ | ------- | -------
10up | https://10up.com/ | Worldwide
17hats | https://www.17hats.com/ | Worldwide

awesome-learning-resources focuses on categorizing learning resources, while remote-jobs maintains a structured list of companies offering remote work opportunities. The former uses simple markdown lists, while the latter employs tables for better organization of company information.

Both repositories serve different purposes: awesome-learning-resources is a curated list of educational resources, while remote-jobs is a comprehensive directory of remote job opportunities. Users looking for learning materials would benefit more from awesome-learning-resources, while those seeking remote work would find remote-jobs more useful.